Legal Opinion

Gould v. Hyatt

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1926No. 1674PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Louis Gould brought this action in Lucas Common Pleas to enjoin Walter Hyatt from declaring a forfeiture of a certain lease.

It appears that Hyatt leased certain premises in the city of Toledo to one Geo. Pfeifer and that subsequently Pfeifer assigned the lease to Gould for the purpose of selling same.

The rent was not paid for two months and thereupon Hyatt notified Gould and Pfeifer that the lease was therefor declared cancelled and forfeited. Gould tendered payment of the rent and same was refused by Hyatt.

Judgment being rendered in favor of Hyatt, Gould appealed. The Court of Appeals held:

1.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. MOORE ET UX v. Richfield Oil Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. 2606 Building v. Mica or I Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Acme Precision Building, Ltd. v. Dayton Forging & Heat Treating, Inc. (In Re Acme Precision Building, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
  4. Zanetos v. SparksOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Peppe v. KnoeppOhio Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API