Legal Opinion

Paul v. Mencher

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.

Judgment for plaintiff. There is no labor dispute as defined by statute between the parties hereto. It is the prerogative of any business man, with or without reason, to continue or discontinue in business, to change, alter or modify the nature of his business as he sees fit without necessity of explanation or excuse to any one. When the plaintiff elected to discontinue his factory no one was privileged to complain even though it was done deliberately to avoid a labor dispute. It may be unfortunate and regrettable that because of such decision willing workers are rendered idle and unhappy.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. BoekhoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Adkins Transfer Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  2. Sloan v. Journal Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Adams Dairy Co. v. Dairy Employees Union, Local 207Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Browning King Co. of Ny, Inc. v. Local 195New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Hoyt-Bedford Co. v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API