Legal Opinion
Joseph Brothers Company, Cross-Appellee v. F.W. Woolworth Company, Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1988No. 85-3636, 85-3637PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Joseph Brothers Company (Joseph Brothers), appeals and defendant, F.W. Woolworth Company (Woolworth), cross-appeals from an order of the district court granting in part and denying in part Joseph Brothers’ motion for summary judgment. Joseph Bros. Co. v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 641 F.Supp. 822 (N.D. Ohio 1985). Joseph Brothers argues that, as a matter of law, an agreement between Woolworth and SCOA Industries, Inc. (SCOA), is an assignment, not a sublease, and that Woolworth breached the terms of its lease with Joseph Brothers by assigning the lease…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Blosser v. EnderlinOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- In Re Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Glyco v. SchultzSylvania Municipal Court · 1972
- F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Buford-Clairmont CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allenfield Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- American Community Stores Corp. v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- In re PampoukidisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1989