Legal Opinion
Glyco v. Schultz
Sylvania Municipal Court
Decided November 24, 1972No. 3851PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLachiN, J.
Plaintiff commenced this action in. forcible entry and detainer on May 25, 1972, seeking possession of certain premises described as 203 North King Road, Holland, Ohio, and praying for rent allegedly due.
Upon defendants’ motion the first cause of action of the complaint was dismissed for failure to serve a three-day notice as required by R. C. 1923.04.
Thereafter defendants answered denying that rent was legally owed and raised affirmative defenses alleging that plaintiff had breached the lease contract, had breached the implied warranty of habitability and had breached the implied covenant of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Javins v. First National Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Thomas v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Lemle v. BreedenHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Brown v. Southall Realty CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Berzito v. GambinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Detling v. EdelbrockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Teller v. McCoyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Jones v. Hyatt Legal Services (In Re Dow)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.