Legal Opinion

Kimble v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided March 2, 1989No. 07-88-0100-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

Appellants Walter Kimble, Lewis A. Wiltz and James Plaisance, being defendants and cross-plaintiffs in the below suit, complain of the summary judgment granted to appellee Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, plaintiff and cross-defendant below. In two points, appellants argue (1) there was no evidence to controvert their motion for summary judgment and it should, therefore, have been granted, and (2) appellee’s evidence in support of its motion for summary judgment was legally insufficient as a matter of law. We affirm the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Tobin v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Ackermann v. VordenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Lopez v. LopezTexas Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ross v. Texas One Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. CruzTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Members Insurance Co. v. Branscum, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  4. Duzich v. Marine Office of America Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  5. Coastal Refining & Marketing, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API