Legal Opinion

Ackermann v. Vordenbaum

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1966No. A-11101PublishedCited by 232 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

Upon an appeal from an order dismissing this cause, the Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and rendered judgment for the plaintiff, Ernestine Vordenbaum. The Court of Civil Appeals held that the trial court erred in overruling the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and rendered judgment for the plaintiff in accordance with Rule 434, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. 393 S.W.2d 927. We affirm.

The plaintiff in the trial court was the appellant in the Court of Civil Appeals and is the respondent here. 1 We will use the trial court designation of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tobin v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wright v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Rogers v. Royalty Pooling CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Brown v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by232 opinions

  1. Jones v. StraussTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Members Mutual Insurance Co. v. Hermann HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Daniel v. Falcon Interest Realty Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  4. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Cengis Tasdemiroglu, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  5. State v. DurhamTexas Supreme Court · 1993

227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API