Fichtel & Sachs Industries, Inc. v. Wilkins
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} Appellee and cross-appellant, Fichtel & Sachs Industries, Inc. (“F&S”), is an automotive-parts wholesale distributor. It contends in its cross-appeal that its packaging of separate clutch parts into a single box labeled “clutch kit” does not constitute processing and, therefore, its inventory of clutch kits qualifies for the “for storage only” exception of R.C. 5701.08, as broadened by R.C. 5711.22. We agree.
{¶ 2} The Tax Commissioner’s appeal in this matter relates to that portion of the Board of Tax Appeals’ (“BTA”) decision that found that F&S’s inventory of clutch parts that had not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- France Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Kennedy v. State Board of Assessment & ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Huron Fish Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- General Mills, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- Accel, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Johnson v. McClain (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021