Legal Opinion

General Mills, Inc. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1988No. 86-1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Concerning the regrind equipment, appellee has filed a “Statement of Additional Authority” with this court in which, upon authority of our decision in General Motors Corp. v. Lindley (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 158, 512 N.E. 2d 660, she concedes appellant’s claim that the re-grind equipment should be excepted from the taxes and agrees to its removal from the assessment. Therefore, the decision of the BTA concerning this equipment is reversed.

Still at issue is the exemption of the packaging materials — the cases in which the boxes containing the cereal are placed for shipment, pallet sheets, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Custom Beverage Packers, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Gressel Produce Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Northwestern Ohio Poultry Ass'n v. SchneiderOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. General Motors Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sauder Woodworking Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Fichtel & Sachs Industries, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. DeNoon v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API