Legal Opinion
Huron Fish Co. v. Glander
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1946No. 30627PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
Section 5546-1, General Code, reads in part as follows:
“ ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales excepting those in which the pux-pose of the consumer is * * * to use or consume the thing transferred directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale by * * * processing * *
Section 5546-25, General Code, contains the following provisions:
“ ‘Use’ means and includes the exercise of any right or power incidental to the ownership of the thing used, excepting as hereinafter provided.
“When the purpose of the consumer is * * * to use or consume the thing transferred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- France Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Moore v. Farmers Mutual Manufacturing & Ginning Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Kennedy v. State Board of Assessment & ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Georgia Warehouse Co. v. JolleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Fischer Artificial Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- State, Department of Revenue v. Alaska Pulp America, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Bay Bottled Gas Co. v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.