Bamdad Mechanic Co. v. United Technologies Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
This case is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for a stay of the proceedings or, in the alternative, to dismiss without prejudice, and defendants’ motion to enjoin plaintiffs from litigating the same claims in federal court in Connecticut. The facts underlying the contract dispute that prompted this litigation have been outlined in an earlier opinion of this Court1 and are not important for purposes of the present motions. The procedural history and posture of the case, however, is central to the disposition of these motions and is set out below.
Proc…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Prc Harris, Inc. v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- American Cyanamid Company v. Robert A. McGheeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Smith v. McIverSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,913 Asset Allocation and Management Company v. Western Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Bill Phillips v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Brotech Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- Youell v. MaddoxDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Shortt v. Richlands Mall Associates, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.