Legal Opinion

Nassar v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 12, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-75074PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S JANUARY 6, 1992 MOTION TO DISMISS

GADOLA, District Judge.

The government filed a motion to dismiss January 6, 1992. The court .believes that plaintiff’s February 26, 1992 letter was filed as a response to the motion. Pursuant to LR 7.1(e)(2) (E.D.Mich. Jan. 1, 1992), no oral argument will be heard.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

Upon a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) or 12(c), all allegations in the complaint are to be accepted as true and construed in favor of the plaintiff. Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1686,…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. United States v. ComerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API