Legal Opinion

United States v. Comer

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 19, 1998No. Civ.A. 95-CV-10182-BCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. 56) AND DEFENDANT COMERS AND TRUST’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. 60)

BINDER, United States Magistrate Judge.

I.RECOMMENDATION

IT IS RECOMMENDED that plaintiffs and defendants’ motions both be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. that as to the validity of notices, demands, and assessments, plaintiff United States’ motion be GRANTED;

2. that as to the enforceability of pre-bankruptcy petition tax liens for the years 1976, 1977, and 1985, both plaintiffs and defendants’…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re O'CallaghanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API