Legal Opinion
State v. Stanko
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 24, 1998No. 98-106PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
¶1 Defendant Rudy Stanko (Stanko) appeals his conviction in the District Court for the Tenth Judicial District, Fergus County, of two counts of reckless driving. We affirm.
¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Does § 46-13-401(2), MCA, providing a six-month period in which to try misdemeanors, apply to a trial de novo in District Court?
¶4 2. Was Stanko bound by his counsel’s consent to a continuance as to one count which was joined for trial with a second count in which Stanko was representing himself?
¶5 3. Did the District Court err in denying Stanko’s motion to dismiss in which…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. BullockMontana Supreme Court · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. AriegweMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. PirelloMontana Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.