Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1999No. 98-381PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

¶1 Wayland Paul Harris (Harris) appeals from the judgment entered by the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, on a jury verdict finding him guilty of incest. We affirm.

¶2 Harris raises the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in failing to instruct the jury that, to find Harris guilty of incest, the jurors must reach a unanimous verdict on at least one specific act of incest?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in concluding that the guilty verdict on the incest charge was not legally inconsistent with the verdict acquitting Harris of sexual intercourse…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. MaldonadoMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. IngrahamMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. PeaseMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. BellMontana Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Clinton Physical Therapy Services, P.C. v. John Deere Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  3. State v. BristerMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. HansonMontana Supreme Court · 1999

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API