Legal Opinion
State v. Dixon
Montana Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 2000No. 98-602PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier
¶ 1 Eric Adam Dixon appeals from an order of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, denying his Motion to Dismiss. We affirm.
¶2 The issues on appeal are as follows:
¶3 1. Whether the District Court erred in concluding that § 45-8-335, MCA, which defines the offense of “Possession of explosives,” does not violate Due Process?
¶4 2. Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Amended Information did not place Dixon in double jeopardy?
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
¶5 The State’s Affidavit of Probable Cause filed on May 29, 1997, contained the following allegations. On May…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KnudsonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BurkhartMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. EgdorfMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. TurbivilleMontana Supreme Court · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.