Legal Opinion
State v. Bullock
Montana Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1995No. 92-536PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler
The defendants, Eddie Peterson and Bill Bullock, were charged in Jefferson County Justice Court with unlawfully killing a game animal in violation of § 87-3-103, MCA, and possession of an unlawfully killed animal in violation of § 87-3-112, MCA. The Justice Court suppressed all of the State’s evidence pertaining to Peterson, and dismissed the charges against Bullock. The State appealed to the District Court for a trial de novo pursuant to § 46-17-311, MCA. On appeal, the District Court denied the defendants’ motions to dismiss and to suppress evidence. Peterson then pled guilty to unlawfully…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- State v. ElisonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. SiegalMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Billings v. BruceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. RussoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- State v. MartinezMontana Supreme Court · 2003
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.