Legal Opinion

Hefley v. Morales

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 21, 1979No. C-1686PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves

We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision in 41 Colo. App. 180, 584 P.2d 1229 which held the petitioner liable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. We reverse.

Sanchez Ochoa hired the respondent, Morales, to work as part of a four-man crew on farms in New Mexico, Oklahoma and Colorado. Ochoa then contracted with the petitioner (Hefley) to cut corn ensilage on Hefley’s farm in Colorado. While cutting the corn, Morales sustained injuries to his arm. Morales filed for workmen’s compensation against Hefley. The Industrial Commission dismissed his claim on the ground that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. BrockColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Faith Realty & Development Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. Anaya v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Hoshiko v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. Billings Ditch Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Finlay v. Storage Technology Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Wills v. Schroeder Aviation, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Olveda v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1981
  4. Nussbaum v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Tanner v. Bosque Honey Farm, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API