Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Bosque Honey Farm, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1995No. 15821PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

Worker appeals from an order dismissing with prejudice his complaint for workers’ compensation. The sole issue on appeal is whether Worker was a “farm laborer” for purposes of the Workers’ Compensation Act. See NMSA 1978, § 52-l-6(A) (Repl.Pamp.1991) (effective January 1, 1992). We hold that the workers’ compensation judge did not err in finding that Worker was a farm laborer and dismissing Worker’s complaint. Accordingly, we affirm.

Many of the judge’s findings are not challenged on appeal. Therefore, they are deemed true for purposes of our analysis. See SCRA 1986,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cowiche Growers, Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Robichaux v. Realty Operators, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Anaya v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Cueto v. Stahmann Farms, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Sanchez v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Brand West DairyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Rodriguez v. Brand West DairyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Rodriguez v. Brand West DairyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Rodriguez v. Brand West DairyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Rodriguez v. Brand West DairyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API