Johnson v. Blair
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Q-rant Circuit Court; H. J. Paulus, Judge. Action by James M. Johnson and others against James II. Blair. Prom a judgment in favor .of defendant, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHenley, C. J.
Appellant has assigned error: (1) The trial court erred in overruling the demurrer to the complaint; (2) the trial court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. The appellants are James Johnson, David O. Ice, and John E. Jones, and they have jointly assigned error.
It appears from the record that the demurrer, to the overruling of which appellants complained, was a separate demurrer of J ames Johnson, and that the motion for a new trial, to the overruling of which appellants have excepted, was the separate motion of appellant James Johnson. The assignment of error, for this reason,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- McFarland v. PierceIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Green v. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Goss v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Sheeks v. State ex rel. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Guyer v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Fowler v. NewsomIndiana Supreme Court · 1909