Legal Opinion

State v. Worden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 30, 1992No. C891308CR, C891309CR; CA A67284 (Control), A67285PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals his four convictions for theft by deception. ORS 164.085(l)(a). We reverse.

Defendant was the general manager and president of Verboort Sausage Company, which made meat snack sticks that it then sold to wholesalers. Federal investigators took samples of three products: “Pepperoni,” “Beef-N-Pepper” and “The Hot One.” Analysis confirmed that each product contained ingredients not listed on its label. In addition to the ingredients fisted on the labels, “The Hot One” and “Beef-N-Pepper” both contained pork, and “Pepperoni” contained soy. Investigation revealed that the snack…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ClermontCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. Taylor v. HenderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API