Kenniston v. Kenniston
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from a judgment of divorce and an order denying the motion for a new trial.
The only point made by appellant that we deem worthy of serious consideration is that there is a want of sufficient corroboration of plaintiff’s testimony to justify the judgment of the court. It is not contested that the plaintiff in 1891 left the defendant in the state of New York, where they had been residing for years; without informing her of whither he expected to go he went to Haverhill, Massachusetts, remaining there only a short time; he then came to Fresno, California, and he has resided there…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baker v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Andrews v. AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- McMullin v. McMullinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Vosburg v. VosburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Comfort v. ComfortCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bell v. BellIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Walker v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Anderson v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Sweet v. SweetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.