Legal Opinion
Alltel Corp. v. Sumner
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 10, 2005No. 04-279PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.
The appellees, Paul .Sumner and Charles Miller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a class-action complaint against the appellants, Alltel Corporation and Alltel Communications, Inc., (collectively hereinafter “Alltel”). In their complaint, Sumner and Miller assert one count of deceptive trade practices in violation of the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Ark. Code Ann. §§ 4-88-101, et. seq. (Repl. 1999). Specifically, they claim that
[bjeginning sometime in the year 2000, Alltel falsely advertised and offered unlimited…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ilah M. Tinder v. Pinkerton SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Rich Hill and Enza Hill, on Behalf of a Class of Persons Similarly Situated v. Gateway 2000, Inc., and David PraisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Crain Industries, Inc. v. CassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Williamson v. Sanofi Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Bank of the Ozarks Inc. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Asset Acceptance, LLC v. NewbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- DIRECTV, Inc. v. MurraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. SmelserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Ggnsc Holdings, LLC v. Lamb Ex Rel. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.