Legal Opinion

McDowell & Craig v. City of Santa Fe Springs

California Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1960No. L. A. No. 25715PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

In this appeal from a judgment denying a writ of mandate and upholding the validity of an annexation of inhabited territory undertaken by respondent City of Santa Fe Springs, we have concluded that the trial court correctly resolved the issue of the time at which under pertinent statutes contiguity of the new territory to the city is to be determined, and that the judgment should be affirmed.

The undisputed facts are as follows:

On May 22, 1957, the city council of Santa Fe Springs passed a resolution approving the circulation of a petition for the annexation of the parcel of inhabited land…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. City of Port Hueneme v. City of OxnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Eatwell v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. City of Costa Mesa v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Department of Mental Hygiene v. KirchnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. CeballosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API