Legal Opinion
Annett v. University of Kansas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 15, 2004No. 03-3069PublishedCited by 214 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Dr. Cynthia Annett filed suit against the University of Kansas under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3, alleging that the University had unlawfully retaliated against her for exercising her rights under Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment to the University. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we AFFIRM.
I
In August 1992, Annett began her employment as a tenure-track assistant professor at the University of Kansas (“University”). She was denied tenure in March 1998, and her employment was terminated at the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by214 opinions
- Self v. OlivaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. C.R. England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Metzler v. Federal Home Loan BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Lounds v. Lincare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Smothers v. Solvay Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
209 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.