Legal Opinion
State v. Horner
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 15, 2006No. 2004-831PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The defendant, Philip Horner, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) dismissing without a hearing his motion to suspend a portion of his sentence. We affirm.
The record reflects the following uncontested facts. In April 2000, the defendant was convicted by a jury on five counts of sexual assault pursuant to RSA 632-A:3, III (Supp. 2005). On each count, the trial court sentenced the defendant to three-and-one-half to seven years in the State Prison. All five sentences were made to run consecutively, but the fourth and fifth sentences vrere suspended.
On the third sentence, the trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Robert Breest v. Raymond Helgemoe, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- State v. FischerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Duquette v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. LamySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. BreedSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.