Legal Opinion
Bradford v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 1938PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
’ My judgment in this consolidated cause, is that the several complaints here involved be dismissed with costs, with will include taxable disbursements divided equally as against the several plaintiffs.
I. My substantive jurisdiction in so far as the national banks are concerned is based on the fact that the suits which are here involved are suits for winding up the affairs of national banking associations — Title 28 United States Code, Section 41, subdivision (16), 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(16). Cf. Pufahl v. Parks’ Estate, 299 U.S. 217, 225, 57 S.Ct. 151, 156, 81 L.Ed. 133—and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Porto Rico v. Rosaly Y CastilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- NML Capital, Ltd. v. Banco Central De La República ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Wheeler v. Blacklands Production Credit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Hackner v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- George R. Bell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Berger v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.