Legal Opinion
Hackner v. Morgan
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 4, 1942No. 325PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
This suit was originally brought by three plaintiffs, Hackner, Bowman and Balling-er, as a class action for themselves and others similarly situated as one-time holders of 6% Gold Notes of the Van Sweringen Corporation. The complaint alleged that the plaintiffs had been wrongfully induced to accept an offer of the Van Sweringen Corporation made on October 29, 1931, to exchange their notes which will be described more fully below. The relief sought was an accounting, damages for the losses sustained and a receiver to distribute the proceeds to the rightful claimants.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hackner v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- In Re United Cigar Stores Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Bradford v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Berger v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- York v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Radio KBUY, Inc. v. LieuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Bar Ray Products, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.