Legal Opinion
Awbrey v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided September 30, 1980No. Civ. A. C78-597A, C78-2009A, C79-2118A and C80-303APublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHOOB, District Judge.
Defendant The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company has moved for summary judgment in its favor in these consolidated cases. It does so on two separate grounds:
1
There is no evidence that any plaintiff had a wire communication intercepted, disclosed, or used.
2
Eleven of the plaintiffs filed their actions more than two years after the last possible date of any alleged wiretapping activities at a store in which they were employed.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, page 2.
For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is DENIED.
A. First Ground.
Defendant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- John L. Broadway v. City of Montgomery, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- William E. Bufalino v. The Michigan Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Everhart v. Rich's, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Mrs. Jack D. Fowler v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Jessie Walker v. Thomas E. Darby, Hugh L. Robinson, Jr., and Kenneth DayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Scutieri v. PaigeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Newcomb v. IngleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Brown v. American Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.