Legal Opinion
In re Albrecht
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.
This proceeding is brought to enforce an attorney’s lien under the provisions of section 475 of the Judiciary Law. The petitioners are duly licensed attorneys and counselors at law engaged in the practice of their profession in Buffalo, N. Y., and elsewhere, and giving special attention to tax matters of all kinds.
There is no substantial dispute as to the facts. Shortly before October, 1924, Menno A. Reeb, the respondent, retained the petitioners herein to represent himself and his wife, Clara C. Reeb, individually, and also as trustee of Virginia C. Reeb; and his daughters Estelle R. Weiss,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Robinson v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Goodrich v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Leask v. HoaglandNew York Supreme Court · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Desmond v. SochaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Capoccia v. BrognanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Renfro v. NixonIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of FrameNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- Brozan v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954