Berlin v. Travelers Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The plaintiff has moved to remand this case to the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City, where it was originally instituted and whence it was removed to this court on the petition of the defendant. The point is made that the jurisdiction of this court does not exist, because, the. case being one of diverse citizenship, there is not the requisite amount of' more than $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs, in controversy in the case.
It appears from the declaration that the plaintiff, as assignee, is suing on a combined life and disability policy of insurance issued…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. MoyleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Cate v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of AlabamaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WestDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. MoyleDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1940
- Stockman v. Reliance Life Ins.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.