United States v. Burczyk
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, United States, has moved for an order requiring the third-party defendants to respond to the plaintiff’s interrogatories. I hold that the motion should be granted.
In its complaint, the United States asks that Mr. Burczyk be held personally responsible for his conduct as receiver; in the latter capacity, Mr. Burczyk is charged with having failed to give prior*466ity to the claim of the United States for unpaid taxes pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 191 and § 192.
In a rambling, repetitive 32-page brief, the third-party defendants seem to rely…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Mozeika v. Kaufman Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Biddle v. HutchinsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
3Cited by1 opinion
- Andrulonis v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1982