Legal Opinion

Biddle v. Hutchinson

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 6057PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to recover against three defendants because of injuries he suffered in an automobile collision. The driver and owner of a motor truck, Smith and Forshey, respectively, are charged with recklessly or negligently driving or causing to be driven the truck against plaintiff’s sedan which he was operating. A road contractor, L. M. Hutchinson, engaged in the reconstruction or repair of highway on which the collision occurred, is charged with doing his work in such a reckless, careless, and negligent manner that the plaintiff and other defendant were not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. M.V.M., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. Cooke v. Kilgore Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954
  3. Kestner v. Reading Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mozeika v. Kaufman Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Felder v. Skibs A/S IdahoDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1964
  3. United States v. BurczykDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API