Legal Opinion
Flynt v. Rumsfeld
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 19, 2003No. CIV.A. 01-2399(PLF)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiffs previously moved for a preliminary injunction against Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and the United States Department of Defense, alleging that defendants were restraining their First Amendment right to have Hustler Magazine correspondents accompany American troops in combat on the ground in Afghanistan; the Court denied plaintiffs’ motion. See Flynt v. Rumsfeld, 180 F.Supp.2d…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Flynt, Larry v. Rumsfeld, Donald H.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- City of Columbus v. MeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Fiberlight, LLC v. National Railroad Passenger CorprationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States Ex Rel. New v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Ord v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.