Miller Rubber Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; D. C. Westenhaver, Judge. Suit in equity by the De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Company against the Miller Rubber Company. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
WARRINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This suit grew out of alleged infringement of letters patent No. 1,OH,450, issued December 12, 1911, to Albert De Laski and Peter D. Thropp, assignors to the De Laski & *734Thropp Circular Woven Tire Company, plaintiff appellee. The Miller Rubber Company, defendant appellant, denies both invention and infringement. A preliminary injunction was granted, and later the cause was tried in open court upon its merits. This resulted in an opinion and decree adjudging validity of the patent as to the claims in suit (1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 20), and their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- William R. Thropp & Sons Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
- De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. William R. Thropp & Sons Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
- General Electric Co. v. New England Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Johnson v. Foos Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- Courtney v. CroxtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- J. F. Rowley Co. v. RowleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930