Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Foos Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1905No. 1,418PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio.

1Opinion of the Court

LURTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a bill to restrain infringement of two patents granted to W. C. Johnson. The first is for certain “improvements in processes of an apparatus for treating cotton seed and - hulls,” and the second for “improvements in means for separating the fiber from cotton-seed hulls.” The first patent was issued December n, 1894, and bears the serial No. 506,268, the second is-No. 654,550, and was issued October 25, 1898. The cause came on to be heard in the court below upon the pleadings, exhibits, and a voluminous book of evidence, but the trial judge, without passing upon…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bedford v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. New York Scaffolding Co. v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  3. J. L. Owens Co. v. Twin City Separator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Sachs v. Hartford Electric Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  5. National Tube Co. v. AikenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API