Kaufman v. All Persons, Etc.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an appeal by the defendants, Young, from the judgment and the order denying them a new trial.
The action was brought in the month of February, 1908, under the provisions of the act of June 16, 1906, popularly known as the “McEnerney Act,” for the purpose of establishing plaintiff’s title to certain real estate situated in the city of San Francisco and to determine the status of all adverse claims to said property.
The defendant, John C. Young, claimed some interest in said real estate, and he was, therefore, served with summons and a copy of the complaint. Said Young, joined by his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tiffany v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Lake v. TebbittsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Brady v. WelshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- In Re Future Manufacturing Cooperative, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
- Long v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Gillingham v. PhelpsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.