Legal Opinion

Gillingham v. Phelps

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1940No. 27969PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This is .a controversy with reference to-who is entitled to the proceeds of an insurance policy which covered property that was destroyed by fire.

To what is called the “third amended supplemental complaint,” which will be referred to as the complaint,, a demurrer was filed. The defendants Lawrence J-Fiman and Frank S. Fiman were defaulted. The defendant Gordon C. Arnold, as assignee, presented an. answer and cross-complaint. The demurrer of the defendant Dora S. Phelps was sustained, and a judgment was entered dismissing the complaint and also the cross-complaint. In the same judgment, it was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wm. Skinner & Sons' Ship-Building & Dry-Dock Co. v. HoughtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. Brady v. WelshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Cetkowski v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Kaufman v. All Persons, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Brakhage v. TracySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Future Manufacturing Cooperative, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
  2. Geranios v. Annex Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Gillingham v. PhelpsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Pruitt v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API