Legal Opinion

Los Angeles & S. L. R. v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 16, 1925No. 44PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

Existing circumstances do not admit of the preparation of a *737full opinion in this ease, although it has received the careful consideration its imporianee demands. We will merely briefly indicate the views which are the basis of the conclusion to which we have come.

The Act of Congress of June 29, 1906 (34 Stat. 584 [Comp. St. § 8563 et seq.]), entitled “An act to amend an act entitled 'An act to regulate commerce,’ approved February fourth, eighteen hundred and eighty-seven, and all acts amendatory thereof, and to enlarge the powers of the Interstate Commerce Commission,” in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Delaware & Hudson Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Delaware & Hudson Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Los Angeles & S. L. R. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1925
  2. (PC) Davis v. UnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. (PC) Felix v. DoughertyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. (PC) Hill v. LeikaufDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. (PC) Mills v. PfefferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API