Legal Opinion

(PC) Hill v. Leikauf

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 22, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01593Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL ALAN HILL, No. 2:23-cv-1593 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JEFF LEIKAUF, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding without an attorney, seeks relief pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 7, 2024, the court granted plaintiff’s applications to proceed in forma 19 pauperis and screened plaintiff’s original complaint. ECF No. 23. Pending before the court are 20 screening of the first amended complaint (“FAC”), plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel, and 21…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API