(PC) Mills v. Pfeffer
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARRYL RAY MILLS, Case No.: 1:20-cv-00195-JLT-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. TO DISMISS ACTION AS FRIVOLOUS AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 14 C. PFEFFER, et al., 15 Defendants. (Doc. 29) 16 21-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 19 Plaintiff Darryl Ray Mills is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 20 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of his original complaint on February 7, 2020. 23 (Doc. 1.)…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.