Legal Opinion

(PC) Mills v. Pfeffer

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 10, 2023No. 1:20-cv-00195Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARRYL RAY MILLS, Case No.: 1:20-cv-00195-JLT-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. TO DISMISS ACTION AS FRIVOLOUS AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 14 C. PFEFFER, et al., 15 Defendants. (Doc. 29) 16 21-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 19 Plaintiff Darryl Ray Mills is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 20 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of his original complaint on February 7, 2020. 23 (Doc. 1.)…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API