Delaware & Hudson Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Per curiam
The unusual nature of this application requires brief explanation. Section 19a of the Interstate Commerce Act plainly puts the burden on the Commission of producing what is called a “tentative valuation.” Such valuation is without any probative effect per se; no proceedings can be based thereupon, and it is no more than a preliminary opinion expressed by the Commission. We think the so-called “tentative valuation” is properly described as an ex parte appraisement. To be sure, this “tentative valuation” becomes final, if a protest be not filed within 30 days.
Petitioners have filed such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1926
- Thomas Bennett Estate, Inc. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. AdkinsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1926
- Los Angeles & S. L. R. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1925