Adair v. City of Norton
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-Appellants Tim and Connie Adair and Paul Ritzman (collectively "the Homeowners") appeal from the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas. This Court affirms.
I
{¶ 2} This appeal involves a dispute over whether a sanitary sewer surcharge imposed by Defendant-Appellee the City of Norton ("Norton"), and collected by the City of Barberton ("Barberton"), applies to the Homeowners based upon the language of the authorizing ordinance. Norton has nine geographic areas within its boundaries that are connected to sanitary sewers. There is no treatment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.