Legal Opinion
Local 512, Warehouse & Office Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 22, 1986No. Nos. 85-7281, 85-7355PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) found that Felbro, Inc. had violated the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) by laying off certain workers and refusing to execute a collective bargaining agreement negotiated with Local 512, Warehouse and Office Workers’ Union (“Local 512”). Many of Felbro’s employees are undocumented alien workers. Relying on its reading of Sure-Tan, Inc. v. NLRB, 467 U.S. 883, 104 S.Ct. 2803, 81 L.Ed.2d 732 (1984), the NLRB conditioned its backpay order on proof at the compliance hearing that the workers whose labor law…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Local 512, Warehouse and Office Workers' Union, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Felbro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Aho Construction I, Inc. v. City Of MoxeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018