Bailey v. Murdock
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Vice Chief Justice.
In the trial court, plaintiff William S. Bailey, Jr., sued the defendant, J. T. Mur-dock, for a judgment establishing a joint venture and for an accounting and division of any joint venture profits held by the defendant. Defendant pleaded, among others, the defenses of laches and estoppel. The following summary of the findings of fact by the trial court, which were supported by the evidence, sufficiently details the facts involved:
1. That in the month of August, 1936, plaintiff and defendant entered into an oral agreement, which was a joint venture between the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Cassidy v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- May v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Wolfe v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Miller v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hedges v. HedgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Harrell v. Samson Resources Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Jath Oil Co. v. Durbin BranchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Gesell v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.