Legal Opinion

Miller v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1914No. 6413PublishedCited by 7 opinions

'Error from Superior Couurt, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by Trump Barnett against David A. Lee and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants Miller bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtBleakmore, J.

This is an action begun in the .•superior court of Muskogee county by the defendant in error, Trump Barnett, against the defendants in error, David A. Lee and E. M. Cowherd, and the plaintiffs in error, E. A. Miller and H. L. Miller, to set aside certain deeds, and for the recovery of the land described therein, and damages for withholding possession thereof. The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court. The cause is presented for review upon a transcript of the record, and only the pleadings and the judgment of the court will be'taken into consideration.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Colorado Coal & Iron Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. McCann v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. United States v. Burlington & Missouri River R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Brink v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Bailey v. MurdockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Primous v. WertzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Harris v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API