Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance v. Sullivan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1901No. 3,341PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Vanderburgh. Superior Court; John II. Foster, Judge. Action by Mary E. Sullivan against the Prudential Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J.. The appellant’s demurrer to each paragraph

of a complaint of the appellee consisting of four paragraphs having been sustained, and leave having been granted the appellee to amend, she filed four additional paragraphs of complaint numbered fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth, a demurrer to each of which for want of sufficient facts was overruled.

In the fifth paragraph of complaint, after showing that the appellant is a corporation, its business being that of life *32insurance, it was in substance stated that in November or December, 1898, the appellant and one William E. Sullivan entered…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. In re DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Willcuts v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Insurance Co. v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Home Insurance v. GilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Knarston v. Manhattan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. NorcrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gastine v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Sterling Fire Insurance v. Comision Reguladora Del Mercado De HenequenIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. R. B. Tyler Co. v. Kirby's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API