Isgett v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stukes, Justice.
Respondent was employed as a car repairer helper by appellant in its yards in Florence. He was released or furloughed in the reduction of employees on March 18, 1949, and was hired again in the same classification on Oct. 11, 1950, but as a new employee without seniority, and is still so employed. The employment was subject to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement between his union and the appellant company. Section (d) of rule 16 of the agreement follows :
“(d) In the restoration of forces, senior laid off men will be given preference in returning to the service, if…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Order of Railway Conductors v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Tharp v. Louisville N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- State Trust Co. v. BraznellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stanley Ex Rel. Stanley v. GarySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- DePass v. CITY OF SPARTANBURGSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- Lee v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Lominick v. City of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Martin v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962