DePass v. CITY OF SPARTANBURG
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stukes, Chief Justice.
After the decision of Richards v. City of Columbia, 227 S. C. 538, 88 S. E. (2d) 683, the city council of Spartan-burg enacted a Substandard Housing Rehabilitation ordinance similar to that under attack in that case, omitting the provisions there adjudged to be invalid. Reference may be had to the cited decision for a better understanding of the case at bar, which concerns enforcement of the Spartanburg •ordinance.
Here plaintiff brought an action in equity, alleging:
The Urban Rehabilitation program is a “three-way deal’’ whereby (1) the owners of substandard houses are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richards v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Daniel, Atty. Gen. v. Conestee MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Isgett v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
- Dunbar v. CITY OF SPARTANBURGSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- American Surety Co. of N.Y. v. MuckenfussSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- Eagle Container Co. Ex Rel. Estate of Spotts v. County of NewberryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Pullman Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- Stanley Ex Rel. Stanley v. GarySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Lominick v. City of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- State v. SchaffelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.