Legal Opinion

Buchhalter v. Rude

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1931No. Nos. 506, 507PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

After a foreclosure sale held in June, 1929, the title to the properties of the Colorado Pulp and Paper Company stood in the names of Rude and Bronstine, joint purchasers at the sale. Rude and Buchhalter were associated in the venture, Rude having applied bonds of the par value of $61,000, exclusive of interest, on the bid at the sale, and Buchhalter having applied bonds and cash to the extent of $53,922. Roughly speaking, Bronstine owned a one-half interest, and Rude and Buchhalter each a one-fourth interest, in the mill. Bronstine was in charge of the operations;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grafton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Northern Assurance Co. of London v. Grand View Building Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Barnsdall v. WaltemeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Doyle v. Hamilton Fish Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cordeco Development Corporation v. Antonio Santiago Vasquez, Cordeco Development Corporation v. Antonio Santiago Vasquez, Inez Acevedo CamposCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  2. Elbert v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. General Paint Corporation v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Taylor v. BrindleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  5. United States Potash Co. v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API