Doyle v. Hamilton Fish Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by the Hamilton Fish Corporation against-Alexander-Doyle. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant, whose counterclaim was dismissed, brings error. The statement of the case and opinion of Learned Hand, District Judge, in the court below, is as follows: This is an action for rent upon the renewal of a lease of premises on East Twentieth street in the city of New York.
Read the full summary
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by the Hamilton Fish Corporation against-Alexander-Doyle. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant, whose counterclaim was dismissed, brings error. The statement of the case and opinion of Learned Hand, District Judge, in the court below, is as follows: This is an action for rent upon the renewal of a lease of premises on East Twentieth street in the city of New York. The defendant was the as-signee of the former lease to the premises which had provisions for a renewal that are the cause…
1Per curiam
We have read the clear and comprehensive opinion of Judge Learned Hand and nothing need be added to its reasoning. We think his conclusions of law are fully sustained by the evidence, and therefore affirm the judgment, with costs, upon his opinion.
2Cited by19 opinions
- Willis v. WillisWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Elbert v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- United States Potash Co. v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Rippey v. Denver United States National BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.